Rio Blanco County Bridge Report Card

Rio Blanco County scores 88 out of 100 on BridgeLookup's Bridge Condition Exposure Score, based on FHWA National Bridge Inventory records.

B88 / 100
Local infrastructure snapshot

Rio Blanco County, Colorado

Rio Blanco County has 56 bridges in the National Bridge Inventory, with 2 rated poor and 1 rated scour-critical. Its poor-condition share of 3.6% is at or below the 4.6% statewide average. Poor-condition bridges carry about 466 daily vehicle crossings.

56Total Bridges
2Poor (3.6%)
38Fair (67.9%)
1Scour-Critical

Quote-Ready Local Facts

3.6%of county bridges are in poor condition, compared with 4.6% statewide and 6.7% nationally.
466daily vehicle crossings are on poor-condition bridges in the county.
1bridges are rated scour-critical, or 1.8% of the county bridge inventory.

Copyable Facts for Reporters

BridgeLookup.com gives Rio Blanco County a Bridge Condition Exposure Score of 88/100 (B). The county has 56 bridges in the National Bridge Inventory, including 2 in poor condition and 1 rated scour-critical. Poor-condition bridges carry about 466 daily vehicle crossings. Poor condition does not mean unsafe; bridges judged unsafe are closed or restricted by transportation agencies.

Download all county report-card scores as CSV.

How the Score Breaks Down

FactorWeightCounty ValuePenalty
Poor-condition bridge share403.6%7.1
Poor-condition traffic exposure251.6% of measured traffic1.2
Scour-critical bridge share201.8%3.6
Average age vs national baseline1044 years vs 48 nationally0.0
Traffic-data completeness528,538 measured daily crossings0.0

Score = 100 minus weighted penalties. The score is a comparative research signal, not an official safety rating. Read the full methodology.

County Comparisons

County Poor-Condition Share3.6%
State Poor-Condition Share4.6%
National Poor-Condition Share6.7%
County Scour-Critical Share1.8%
Average Bridge Age44 years
Poor-Condition Traffic Exposure466 vehicles/day

Bridges to Watch

Top Bridges to Watch in Rio Blanco County

BridgeReasonConditionDaily TrafficYear Built
County Road 5 over Piceance CreekPoor condition + traffic exposurePoor3251970
County Road 17 over North Fork White RiverPoor condition + traffic exposurePoor1411990
County Road 121 over S.fk Williams Fork RiverScour-critical foundation ratingFair321984
SH 64 Ml over White RiverHigh trafficFair3,5001948
SH 64 Ml over Stinking Water CreekHigh trafficFair2,4001982
SH 13 Ml over White RiverHigh trafficGood2,1002000
SH 64 Ml over Douglas CreekHigh trafficGood1,6001990
Tenth Street over White RiverHigh trafficFair1,4431998
SH 13 Ml over Curtis CreekHigh trafficFair1,3001958
SH 13 Ml over Curtis CreekHigh trafficFair1,3001959

Important safety note

Poor condition does not mean a bridge is unsafe. It means at least one major component has significant deterioration and the bridge is a priority for maintenance, repair, or replacement. Bridges judged unsafe are closed or restricted by transportation agencies.