Habersham County Bridge Report Card

Habersham County scores 98 out of 100 on BridgeLookup's Bridge Condition Exposure Score, based on FHWA National Bridge Inventory records.

A98 / 100
Local infrastructure snapshot

Habersham County, Georgia

Habersham County has 107 bridges in the National Bridge Inventory, with 0 rated poor and 0 rated scour-critical. Its poor-condition share of 0.0% is at or below the 1.7% statewide average.

107Total Bridges
0Poor (0.0%)
46Fair (43.0%)
0Scour-Critical

Quote-Ready Local Facts

0.0%of county bridges are in poor condition, compared with 1.7% statewide and 6.7% nationally.
0daily vehicle crossings are on poor-condition bridges in the county.
0bridges are rated scour-critical, or 0.0% of the county bridge inventory.

Copyable Facts for Reporters

BridgeLookup.com gives Habersham County a Bridge Condition Exposure Score of 98/100 (A). The county has 107 bridges in the National Bridge Inventory, including 0 in poor condition and 0 rated scour-critical. Poor-condition bridges carry about 0 daily vehicle crossings. Poor condition does not mean unsafe; bridges judged unsafe are closed or restricted by transportation agencies.

Download all county report-card scores as CSV.

How the Score Breaks Down

FactorWeightCounty ValuePenalty
Poor-condition bridge share400.0%0.0
Poor-condition traffic exposure250.0% of measured traffic0.0
Scour-critical bridge share200.0%0.0
Average age vs national baseline1052 years vs 48 nationally1.6
Traffic-data completeness5624,807 measured daily crossings0.0

Score = 100 minus weighted penalties. The score is a comparative research signal, not an official safety rating. Read the full methodology.

County Comparisons

County Poor-Condition Share0.0%
State Poor-Condition Share1.7%
National Poor-Condition Share6.7%
County Scour-Critical Share0.0%
Average Bridge Age52 years
Poor-Condition Traffic Exposure0 vehicles/day

Bridges to Watch

Top Bridges to Watch in Habersham County

BridgeReasonConditionDaily TrafficYear Built
US 23 (sbl)/sr 365 over CR 542 J Warren RoadHigh trafficGood67,4001979
US 123 (sbl)/sr 36 over SR 15 (us 23-441)High trafficGood66,5001990
Us23/419-sr15/365 over SR 197High trafficGood65,7001990
US 23 (nbl)/sr 365 over CR 542 J Warren RoadHigh trafficGood28,6001979
US 23-sr 15 @ 4.71 over Camp CreekHigh trafficFair27,9001990
US 23-sr 15 @ 6.01 over Lick Log CreekHigh trafficFair26,2001990
US 441 Bus./sr 105 over SR 365 (us 23)High trafficFair25,2001988
US 23-sr 365 over South Fork Mud CreekHigh trafficGood23,6001979
US 23-sr 15/365 over Little Hazel CreekHigh trafficGood21,1001989
Us23/419-sr15/365 over SR 197High trafficGood21,1001990

Important safety note

Poor condition does not mean a bridge is unsafe. It means at least one major component has significant deterioration and the bridge is a priority for maintenance, repair, or replacement. Bridges judged unsafe are closed or restricted by transportation agencies.